Vue 3 with the Composition API for teams that want React's flexibility and Vue's ergonomics. We build and modernize Vue applications — including migrations from Vue 2's Options API to Vue 3.
Vue 2 to Vue 3 is the migration most Vue teams under-budget. We've shipped enough of them to know which patterns survive (script-setup) and which need rewriting (filters, event-bus). We cost it honestly.
A platform engineering keeps shipping into without rewrites — and that audit, security, and finance can each defend.
Concrete deliverables — not adjectives. Each engagement scopes which of these are in play and what success looks like for them.
Drawn from sales calls, not SEO filler. Want a question added? Drop it in the form on this page — we update from real enquiries.
Vue 2 reached end-of-life. The migration cost depends on how many Options API patterns you used. We do a one-week diagnostic before quoting.
Pinia for new work — it's the official Vue 3 state library. Vuex only when an existing codebase isn't ready to migrate.
Vue for SPAs. Nuxt when you need SSR/SSG/ISR or Nitro's deployment flexibility — see our Nuxt.js page.
Yes — Vue's gradual-adoption story is the most forgiving migration target for AngularJS codebases.
We build production Next.
Nuxt 3 done right — Vue 3 Composition API, Nitro on the server, and the rendering model chosen per route rather than as a global setting.
React for product teams that need engineering discipline as much as developer experience.
Angular for enterprise teams that need batteries-included structure — TypeScript, RxJS, dependency injection, and the modern Signals primitive.
SvelteKit for teams who care about bundle size and ergonomics in equal measure.
Astro for content-heavy sites where JavaScript is a tax, not a feature.
