Go where the workload demands it — high-throughput services, latency-sensitive paths, infrastructure tooling, and the kind of backend where a 99th-percentile guarantee is a contract requirement.
Go is a sharp tool. We don't recommend it as the default for product teams who'd be better served by Node or Python. We pick Go for hot-path services, infrastructure-adjacent work, and teams that already have Go muscle.
Go services that hit their latency budget and stay there — under load, on the wrong cloud zone, on a Tuesday.
Concrete deliverables — not adjectives. Each engagement scopes which of these are in play and what success looks like for them.
Drawn from sales calls, not SEO filler. Want a question added? Drop it in the form on this page — we update from real enquiries.
When you have a latency or throughput budget the runtime can't meet, or when you're building infrastructure-class tooling. For most product backends, Go is overkill.
Standard library + chi or gin for routing. We don't use heavy frameworks — Go's stdlib is enough for production.
gRPC for service-to-service. REST or GraphQL at the public edge. Don't expose gRPC directly to browsers without a translation layer.
Smaller pool than Node, larger than Rust. We've onboarded JavaScript engineers onto productive Go work in 4–6 weeks.
We build production Next.
Nuxt 3 done right — Vue 3 Composition API, Nitro on the server, and the rendering model chosen per route rather than as a global setting.
React for product teams that need engineering discipline as much as developer experience.
Vue 3 with the Composition API for teams that want React's flexibility and Vue's ergonomics.
Angular for enterprise teams that need batteries-included structure — TypeScript, RxJS, dependency injection, and the modern Signals primitive.
SvelteKit for teams who care about bundle size and ergonomics in equal measure.
