Node.js for backend engineering — Express for lean APIs, NestJS for enterprise structure, Fastify for performance, Bun where startup time matters. Built with TypeScript, observability, and the operational discipline production demands.
Node.js gets blamed for the bad backends written in it. The runtime is fine — what matters is the architecture: bounded contexts, idempotent handlers, structured logging, and graceful shutdown. We ship those by default.
Backend services that survive load, deploys, and the on-call rotation that uses them.
Concrete deliverables — not adjectives. Each engagement scopes which of these are in play and what success looks like for them.
Drawn from sales calls, not SEO filler. Want a question added? Drop it in the form on this page — we update from real enquiries.
NestJS when team size and module discipline justify the structure. Express for lean services with one or two engineers. We don't reach for NestJS reflexively.
For specific services where startup time or HTTP throughput dominate, yes. We don't switch a working Node codebase to Bun for fashion's sake.
REST by default — fewer surprises in caching, observability, and client tooling. GraphQL when the consumer needs justify the operational cost.
BullMQ for Redis-backed queues, Temporal or Inngest for durable workflows, plain cron for the boring stuff. We don't over-engineer.
We build production Next.
Nuxt 3 done right — Vue 3 Composition API, Nitro on the server, and the rendering model chosen per route rather than as a global setting.
React for product teams that need engineering discipline as much as developer experience.
Vue 3 with the Composition API for teams that want React's flexibility and Vue's ergonomics.
Angular for enterprise teams that need batteries-included structure — TypeScript, RxJS, dependency injection, and the modern Signals primitive.
SvelteKit for teams who care about bundle size and ergonomics in equal measure.
